Ετικέτες

Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Pets. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Pets. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Σάββατο 11 Ιουλίου 2026

Η έννοια της "Ευζωίας" και οι "Πέντε Ελευθερίες" των ζώων κατά τον τελευταίο αιώνα της εκμετάλλευσης τους από τους ανθρώπους (updated)

 

Οι Πέντε Ελευθερίες των Ζώων (Five Freedoms) οι οποίες, στην Ελλάδα σήμερα, εμφανίζονται ως "πρωτοπορία", δεν είναι κάτι καινούργιο. Η ιστορία τους ανάγεται στο Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο, το μακρινό 1964, με αφορμή ένα τεκμηριωμένο σύγγραμμα που περιγράφει την υποβάθμιση των ζώων σε παραγωγικές μηχανές. Πρόκειται για το βιβλίο της Αγγλίδας ακτιβίστριας Ruth Harrison, που έχει τίτλο "Animal Machines", εισάγει τον όρο "Factory Farming", και παρουσιάζει τις πρακτικές της εντατικοποιημένης κτηνοτροφίας, προκαλώντας δημόσια κατακραυγή. [Διαβάστε περισσότερα εδώ]. 


Ήταν λοιπόν η δημόσια κατακραυγή για την κακοποίηση των παραγωγικών ζώων - ήδη από τα μέσα της δεκαετίας του '60 - αυτό που ώθησε την βρετανική κυβέρνηση στη σύσταση μιας επιτροπής που ανέλαβε να διερευνήσει το ζήτημα. Έτσι, σε μια πρώτη προσέγγιση που αποτέλεσε τον πρόδρομο των Πέντε Ελευθεριών και έγινε γνωστή ως έκθεση Brambell (1965), η επιτροπή αυτή αναφέρει ότι σε κάθε ζώο θα πρέπει να παρέχεται η δυνατότητα "να σηκώνεται όρθιο, να ξαπλώνει, να κάνει στροφή επί τόπου, να περιποιείται το τρίχωμά του και να τεντώνει τα πόδια του"! Τόσο "καλά" και τόσο ΤΡΑΓΙΚΑ! Από τότε, για την "ευζωία" (καλή διαβίωση των ζώων - animal welfare - βλ. ετυμολογία), ξοδεύτηκε κάμποσο μελάνι, ακόμη και σήμερα όμως, στον "πολιτισμένο" Δυτικό κόσμο, εκατομμύρια θηλυκά γουρούνια αναπαραγωγής που περνούν τη ζωή τους μέσα στα κλουβιά λοχείας και τοκετού (gestation και farrowing crates), ΔΕΝ έχουν την δυνατότητα να κάνουν στροφή επί τόπου, ούτε να τεντώσουν τα πόδια τους!


Με δύο λόγια, οι Πέντε Ελευθερίες (οι οποίες αρχικά είχαν σκοπό να περιγράψουν την απαλλαγή των "παραγωγικών" ζώων από τον πέρα από κάθε φαντασία βασανισμό που τους επιφυλάσσει η αντιμετώπιση τους ως άψυχες μηχανές, και στη συνέχεια βρήκαν εφαρμογή και στα άλλα είδη - όπως ζώα εργασίας, συντροφιάς κλπ) περιλαμβάνουν τρεις συνθήκες (προϋποθέσεις) που αναφέρονται στην σωματική τους διάσταση, και δύο που αναφέρονται στην ψυχοδιανοητική. Οι συνθήκες αυτές είναι: 1) απαλλαγή από την πείνα και την δίψα, 2) απαλλαγή από την κακουχία, 3) προσπάθεια απαλλαγής από κάθε πόνο, τραυματισμό και ασθένεια, 4) απαλλαγή από την στέρηση της δυνατότητας έκφρασης φυσιολογικής συμπεριφοράς, και 5) απαλλαγή από τον φόβο και την αγωνία. 

Συνοπτικά, η απαλλαγή ενός ζώου από τον βασανισμό προϋποθέτει επάρκεια τροφής και νερού (freedom from hunger and thirst), διαβίωση και ξεκούραση σε προστατευμένο και κατάλληλο περιβάλλον (freedom from discomfort), απουσία σωματικής κακοποίησης και προσφορά της αναγκαίας προληπτικής και θεραπευτικής φροντίδας (freedom from pain, injury, disease), δυνατότητα έκφρασης της φυσιολογικής για το είδος του συμπεριφοράς (freedom to express normal behavior), και απουσία συναισθηματικής κακοποίησης με πρόκληση φόβου, ματαίωσης και δυστυχίας (freedom from fear and distress). 


Το 2009, ο πίνακας των πέντε ελευθεριών εκσυγχρονίστηκε από την Βρετανική Επιτροπή Ευζωίας των Παραγωγικών Ζώων (Farm Animal Welfare Committee), προκειμένου αυτές να αποτελέσουν ένα αντικειμενικό εργαλείο αξιολόγησης της ευζωίας. Έτσι, προέκυψε η δυνατότητα αξιολόγησης της ποιότητας της ζωής ενός ή περισσοτέρων ζώων, που διακρίνεται σε υψηλή, καλή, μέτρια, πτωχή και ανυπόφορη, δηλαδή ζωή που ένα ζώο αξίζει ή δεν αξίζει να ζει, όπως θα έκρινε το ίδιο το ζώο αν μπορούσε να αποφασίσει για τον εαυτό του ("a life worth or not worth living from THEIR point of view"). 


Στην πράξη, αν και η κακοποίηση των ζώων συντροφιάς γνωστοποιείται και προβάλλεται με όλο και περισσότερη έμφαση από τα ΜΜΕ, ο βασανισμός των "παραγωγικών" ειδών (που χρησιμοποιούνται για ένδυση και τροφή) μένει πίσω από τις κλειστές πόρτες των εκτροφείων, των οχημάτων μεταφοράς και των σφαγείων. Έτσι, η αντίδραση του κοινού, στην πρώτη περίπτωση  επικροτείται ως "δείκτης πολιτισμού", ενώ στη δεύτερη λοιδωρείται, ακυρώνεται και ενίοτε τιμωρείται ως "ακρότητα", που πάντοτε θεωρείται υπερβολική και συχνά είναι απαγορευμένη (βλ. Ag-gag laws). Δεδομένης μάλιστα της ραγδαίας αύξησης ενός ανθρώπινου πληθυσμού που επιμένει να ταυτίζει την ευημερία του με την κατανάλωση ζωϊκής πρωτεΐνης, η εντατικοποίηση της παραγωγής (με την συνεπαγόμενη βιομηχανοποίηση της κτηνοτροφίας), κανονικοποιείται, νομιμοποιείται και αυξάνεται συνεχώς, ενώ τα ζώα υποφέρουν όλο και περισσότερο. 


Και κάπως έτσι φτάσαμε να βλέπουμε πως για την κακοποίηση ενός και μόνον σκύλου κινητοποιείται το πανελλήνιο, ενώ για την μαζική ταφή χιλιάδων αιγοπροβάτων, συνήθως κάτω από αποτρόπαιες συνθήκες (βλ. πχ ευλογιά), ανησυχούμε μονάχα μην τυχόν ακριβύνει η φέτα... 

Κάπως έτσι βλέπουμε λοιπόν πως, αν και το ζήτημα της ευζωίας τέθηκε αρχικά για τα "παραγωγικά", πριν από 60 και πλέον χρόνια, σήμερα γίνεται λόγος μόνο για τα ζώα συντροφιάς (περισσότερο) και για τα ζώα εργασίας (λιγότερο). Για τα ζώα της εντατικοποιημένης κτηνοτροφίας (που εξακολουθούν να αντιμετωπίζονται ως μηχανές παραγωγής - βλ. The Ghosts in Our Machine), τα πράγματα θα μπορούσαν - ΙΣΩΣ - να γίνουν ΛΙΓΟ καλύτερα, μόνο ΑΝ αποφασίζαμε να αλλάξουμε τις καταναλωτικές μας συνήθειες (αν όχι ποιοτικά, τουλάχιστον ποσοτικά - τρώγοντας δηλαδή λιγότερα ζωικά προϊόντα). 

Με άλλα λόγια, σε έναν κόσμο οκτώ δισεκατομμυρίων  ανθρώπων, δεν μπορούμε να μιλάμε για φιλοζωία και "ευζωία", αν συνεχίσουμε να στηρίζουμε ένα κάθε άλλο παρά  συμπονετικόκακοποιητικό (για ανθρώπους, ζώα και περιβάλλονκαι μη βιώσιμο διατροφικό σύστημα. 



Οι ΠΕΝΤΕ Ελευθερίες των ζώων, οι οποίες εστιάζουν μόνο σε αρνητικές καταστάσεις, και τις οποίες, ακόμη και σήμερα, πολλοί επικαλούνται ενώ μπερδεύουν με τα "δικαιώματα", παπαγαλίζουν ή και αγνοούν [προχτές, διάβασα κάπου, σε μια προχειρογραμμένη διατύπωση - διακήρυξη πολιτικού φορέα, ότι οι πέντε ελευθερίες είναι τέσσερεις...], δεν συνιστούν πρωτοπορία αλλά ένα μοντέλο αξιολόγησης που πλέον θεωρείται (και είναι) αναχρονιστικό. 

Ήδη από το 1994, για την αξιολόγηση της ευζωίας των ζώων κατά την "χρήση" τους από τους ανθρώπους, ο πρωτοπόρος και βραβευμένος καθηγητής Εφαρμοσμένης Φυσιολογίας και Βιοηθικής, David Mellor (Νέα Ζηλανδία), έχει προτείνει μια νέα προσέγγιση, η οποία δεν προβλέπει μόνο την εκτίμηση των αρνητικών εμπειριών αλλά και των θετικών. Έτσι το μοντέλο των Πέντε Ελευθεριών (Five Freedoms) τείνει πλέον να αντικατασταθεί από εκείνο των Πέντε Πεδίων (Five Domains), τα οποία αφορούν επίσης στην σίτιση, το περιβάλλον, την υγεία, την συμπεριφορά και την ψυχοδιανοητική κατάσταση των ζώων. [Διαβάστε περισσότερα εδώ και εδώ].


Σήμερα, πέρα από κάθε συλλογική σκοπιμότητα, κάθε διατροφική προτίμηση, και κάθε ατομική συναισθηματική υπερβολή, το ζήτημα της "Ευζωίας" των ζώων (ΟΛΩΝ των ζώων, και όχι μόνο εκείνων που επιλέγουμε για "prestige", παιχνίδι, "ψυχοφάρμακο", μόδα ή συντροφιά) είναι ένα ζωτικό και νευραλγικό πεδίο αλληλοεπικάλυψης της Επίγνωσης με την Τρυφερότητα και της Ηθικής με την Επιστήμη, στα πλαίσια μιας κρίσιμης ατομικής και συλλογικής αναγκαιότητας για ανάληψη Ευθύνης. Και δεν νοείται πολιτικός σχηματισμός (δεξιός, κεντρώας ή "αριστερός") που προβάλλει φιλοζωική ατζέντα με μεγαλόσχημες διακηρύξεις για την "Ευζωία" ή/και τα (υποτιθέμενα) "Δικαιώματα"* των ζώωνχωρίς αναφορά στις διατροφικές επιλογές των πολιτών και τα συμφέροντα που τις κατευθύνουν.


Στην πρώτη φωτογραφία, η Ruth Harrison σε εκτροφείο γούνας στην Δανία, το 1997 (at researchgate και at Pioneers of Change for Animals) -- POWER of ONE [Fb]

Η δεύτερη είναι από την ιστοσελίδα της οργάνωσης COMPASSION in world farming

Στην τελευταία, ο David Mellor, το 1971



 ΠαραπομπήΑν και η κακοποίηση των ζώων τίθεται ως ζήτημα ήδη από τον 19ο αιώνα (στο Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο και την Αμερική, όπου δημιουργήθηκαν δύο μεγάλες οργανώσεις, η RSPCA, το 1824, και η ASPCA, το 1866, ως πρωτοπόροι της προστασίας τους από την υπερεκμετάλλευση και τον βασανισμό), η σχέση των ανθρώπων με τα ζώα άρχισε να αλλάζει ριζικά μετά τον δεύτερο παγκόσμιο πόλεμο, με την αστικοποίηση (urbanization), την μετατροπή της κτηνοτροφίας σε βαριά βιομηχανία, και την προαγωγή του σκύλου και της γάτας σε "μέλη της οικογένειας". Τότε είναι που άρχισε να τίθεται για πρώτη φορά και το ζήτημα της ευζωίας καθώς, κατά τις δεκαετίας του '60 και του '70, αρχίζουν να εκφράζονται τα 3 μεγάλα κινήματα για τα ζώα: το κίνημα της Ευζωίας (Animal Welfare), το κίνημα των Δικαιωμάτων (Animal Rights) και το κίνημα της Ολικής ή Πλήρους Απελευθέρωσης (Animal Liberation movement). 

Η λογική της υπεράσπισης των δικαιωμάτων των ζώων εκπορεύεται από την φιλοσοφία και την περιβαλλοντική ηθική, και δεν ταυτίζεται ούτε με την διατήρηση ενός ή περισσοτέρων ζώων συντροφιάς, ούτε με την φιλοζωίαΗ "ευζωία" και τα "δικαιώματα" είναι διαφορετικές έννοιες, καθώς η θεωρία των Δικαιωμάτων αποκλείει κάθε μορφή χρησιμοποίησης και εκμετάλλευσης των ζώων από τους ανθρώπους. Συνεπώς, νεολογισμοί όπως "δικαίωμα στην ευζωία" είναι φράσεις κενές περιεχομένου που όχι μόνο δεν ενημερώνουν (ούτε ευαισθητοποιούν) τον κόσμο, αλλά συσκοτίζουν και παραπέμπουν σε λαϊκισμό. 



Επιλεκτικές αναφορές
























Δευτέρα 26 Ιανουαρίου 2026

Η μουσούδα



Με λένε με το όνομα που μου έδωσες. Μα, εκτός από το όνομα, είμαι μια μουσούδα. Μικρή, υγρή, μαύρη, με δύο τρυπούλες που εισπνέουν τον κόσμο. 

Είμαι το πρώτο σημείο που γεννιέται η αγάπη κι η τελευταία άκρη που φεύγει όταν όλα τελειώσουν. 

Μη γελιέσαι. Δεν είμαι απλώς ένα κομμάτι από ρύγχος. Είμαι μνήμη. Είμαι υπομονή. Είμαι η σιωπηλή σου συνοδός στα μονοπάτια της ζωής. 

Θυμάμαι την πρώτη μου μέρα με εκείνον. Τον άνθρωπό μου. Ήμουν κουτάβι. Τα πάντα γύρω μου καινούρια, οι ήχοι δυνατοί, οι μυρωδιές καταιγίδα. Έτρεμα. Και τότε, μύρισα το χέρι του. Ένα μείγμα από σαπούνι, λίγο φόβο, λίγη μοναξιά. Και κάτω απ’ όλα, κάτι όμορφο. Η μυρωδιά μιας καρδιάς που ήθελε να αγαπήσει ξανά. Με τη μουσούδα μου τον άγγιξα. Ήσυχα. Μια μικρή υπόσχεση: "Θα σε βρω πάντα, ακόμα κι αν χαθείς". 

Από τότε, έγινα ο φρουρός της σιωπής του. Στις μέρες που τα μάτια του δεν ήθελαν να κοιτάξουν κανέναν, πήγαινα και ακουμπούσα τον ώμο του. Ήσυχα. Δεν χρειαζόταν να μιλήσει. Ήξερα. Η μουσούδα μου καταλάβαινε πριν από εκείνον. Μύριζα τα δάκρυά του πριν κυλήσουν. Τα γέλια του πριν ακουστούν. Μύριζα τη βροχή στα μαλλιά του και τη μελαγχολία στις νύχτες του. Όταν έβγαινε από το μπάνιο, όταν επέστρεφε από μια κακή μέρα, όταν δεν είχε διάθεση να φάει. Πάντα μύριζα τα πάντα. Και πήγαινα κοντά. Έσπρωχνα το χέρι του απαλά, σαν να του έλεγα "είμαι εδώ, βάλε το μέτωπό σου πάνω μου και άσε με να σε κρατήσω". 

Δεν ήξερε ποτέ πόσα ήξερα. Μα δεν με πείραζε. Η ζωή μας πέρασε με βόλτες. Πάρκα, γωνιές, λιμάνια. Κάθε μέρος το χάραζα με την όσφρησή μου. Όχι για να το διεκδικήσω, όπως λένε. Αλλά για να θυμάμαι. Να μπορώ να τον ξαναβρώ, αν μια μέρα χαθεί. Γιατί η μουσούδα μου έχει μνήμη αιώνια. Δεν ξεχνά. Μια φορά, είχαμε χωριστεί. Είχα τρομάξει από κάτι και είχα τρέξει. Έψαχνα, γύριζα, δεν τον έβρισκα. Ο αέρας ήταν γεμάτος θορύβους και σκιές. Αλλά εκεί, σ’ έναν δρόμο γεμάτο φωνές και άγνωστους, τον μύρισα. Λίγο άγχος, λίγη ελπίδα, και, ναι, το σαπούνι. Και έτρεξα. Και τον βρήκα. 

Με φίλησε στο ρύγχος και δάκρυσε. Δεν είπε τίποτα. Ούτε κι εγώ. Μα η καρδιά του είχε πει ήδη το ευχαριστώ, με έναν χτύπο που ταρακούνησε ολόκληρο τον κόσμο μου. Τα χρόνια πέρασαν. Η μουσούδα μου άρχισε να γκριζάρει. Κι εκείνος να σκύβει πιο αργά να με χαϊδέψει. Όμως, κάθε πρωί, όταν έβγαινε από το υπνοδωμάτιο, ήμουν εκεί. Τον πλησίαζα και ακουμπούσα το ρύγχος μου στο χέρι του. Μια μικρή υπενθύμιση: "Σ’ αγαπώ ακόμα. Μυρίζεις όπως τότε". 

Ώσπου ήρθε εκείνη η μέρα. Δεν μπορούσα πια να ανέβω στον καναπέ. Η καρδιά μου, αν και γεμάτη, έδειχνε να βαραίνει. Εκείνος ήρθε κοντά μου. Με πήρε αγκαλιά, με τύλιξε στην παλιά μας κουβέρτα. Εκείνη που κουβαλούσε βροχές, φόβους, και τρυφερές Κυριακές. Ακούμπησα τη μουσούδα μου στο στήθος του. Ήρεμα. Ένιωσα την καρδιά του. Ήταν γεμάτη. Κι ας πονούσε. Τον μύρισα για τελευταία φορά. Εκείνη την απέραντη μυρωδιά της αγάπης που δεν ζητά τίποτα. 

Και όταν έκλεισα τα μάτια μου, η μουσούδα μου έμεινε εκεί, σαν ένα μικρό αόρατο σχοινί. Ένας όρκος χωρίς λέξεις. Γιατί, να το θυμάσαι: Όταν όλα τα λόγια σωπάσουν, όταν φύγουν οι άνθρωποι και μείνουν οι σκιές, όταν νομίσεις πως είσαι μόνος, βάλε την παλάμη στο πρόσωπό σου και φαντάσου ένα μικρό, υγρό ρύγχος να σε αγγίζει απαλά. Είμαι εκεί. Η μουσούδα σου. Δεν σε ξέχασα ποτέ.


Πέτρος Κατσάκος, 22/01/26


Στη φωτογραφία εγώ κι' ο "Μπεμπές" μου (κατά κόσμον Ben, 1995 - 2006) 

Σάββατο 14 Δεκεμβρίου 2024

Narcissists And Animals: Η ναρκισσιστική πλευρά της "φιλοζωίας"

 

Άρθρο του Jon Rhodes στην ιστοσελίδα https://narcissisms.com/


Different narcissists have different attitudes towards animals. At least on the surface. Some appear loving. Some indifferent. And some downright cruel. But what unites all narcissists is they don’t emotionally care about pets, any more than they emotionally care about people. And if they do appear to care, they’re faking itThere’s many reasons why some narcissists fake loving animals, which I’ll explore in this article. I’ll also look at what narcissists gain from their apparent differing attitudes towards their pets.

Narcissists like to create a façade that shows them as honest and decent people. Ultimately they want to be admired and given attention. And most realise they can’t achieve this by being narcissistic all the time. Being an "animal lover" is part of some narcissists’ tool boxes to make them appear empathic, loving, and kind. And helps them reel in unsuspecting victims. Narcissists know they must sometimes act "nice" to receive the attention and adulation they crave. Narcissists don’t care for animals. They only care for what they do for them. And may neglect them when no one is watching. In front of people they want impress, narcissists show their supposed caring side. And gain a welcomed boost to their façade. For some narcissists, façade management is EVERYTHING. And they’ll go to extraordinary lengths to boost it. 

Some narcissists make BIG shows of love for their pet. Spending time with them. Grooming and caring for them. And showing them more affection than they do their human companions. In this case, it’s likely the narcissist is triangulating with their pet. They’re showing that the animal is more important than you. It’s a subtle way of devaluing you, and putting you in your place – well beneath them. Telling you that you’re so lowly, even an animal outranks you. Of course they won’t admit this if you ask. They’re more likely to act flabbergasted, exclaiming, "Can’t I even care for my pet?" And probably accuse you of being jealous. But really you gave them the reaction they wanted. They’re happy they can put you down indirectly by caring for their pet. And have a button to push whenever they want to put you down, or gain a reaction. 

Some narcissists are aware of animals magnetic powers when it comes to impressing objects of their desires. And may use them as pick up tools. The narcissist may frequent parks with their pet, looking for suitable victims. Once a target has been locked on, they move in. Pets are great ice breakers for starting conversations. A popular tactic is to seductively pet their crushes dog, commenting on how beautiful it is. Using metaphors to indirectly compliment the owner. If a narcissist is particularly enamoured, they may visit the park at the same time, hoping to "accidentally" bump into them again. So if your narcissist partner disappears at regular times with their dog, then they could be up to something! 

As you’re probably aware, narcissists are transactional with their relationships. They only want useful people around them. And that also applies to animals. Façade is one use I’ve already touched on. The animal may also be useful in other ways. It may be a cat that kills mice. Or a working animal if they own a farm or land. They may even keep chickens to provide them with the finest eggs. Fit for the royalty they believe they are.Narcissists don’t make room for things that aren’t useful in some way. They’re not interested in giving love. They only want to take. 

Narcissists with borderline traits seem to enjoy keeping animals as a means of control. They can legally lock them in cages. Safe in the knowledge the animal is waiting for their return. This is reassuring because they often live in fear of people abandoning them. And since they can’t legally lock people up, this is the next best thing. Some narcissists love faithful companions following them around. And love the obedience of animals such as dogs. They’re not usually enamoured by more independent animals, such as cats. 


Dogs are perfect for narcissists. They give unlimited attention, any time of the day. Love their owners unconditionally, no matter how they’re treated. And are obedient and subservient to the narcissists commands. Dogs are always pleased to see their owners. Which makes them feel important. And they demand little in return. Dogs may also be used as status symbols for narcissists. Because they see them as extensions of themselves. So depending on how they want to be portrayed, they may choose a dog that’s big and powerful, elegant, or expensive. 

On the flip side, narcissists rarely like cats. Cats are more aloof and independent than dogs. And will happily ignore the narcissist if they’re not in the mood.This challenges the narcissists delusions of superiority. If they can’t get a lowly cat to do as it’s told, what does it say about them? As with people, narcissists want animals to control and meet THEIR needs. They’re not interested in honouring their preferences or giving them love. It’s ALL about what the narcissist wants. 


Some narcissists have no time for animals. They’re not interested in petting or even looking at them. These narcissists are unashamedly indifferent. They feel that animals are no use to them. So why waste their energy? In their mind, animals are so far beneath them that they don’t warrant their attention. And they don’t want to compromise their higher status by associating with them. 

More Machiavellian narcissists may be cruel to animals. Particularly when they’re younger. A friend of mine once had a game called "operation last supper". This is where he threw bread on his shed roof to feed the birds. What a lovely gesture. Then proceeded to shoot them with his air rifle. The narcissists lack of emotional empathy extends to animals. So they don’t feel their pain. And don’t lie awake at night feeling guilty for the suffering they’ve caused. This makes it easier for them to mistreat animals.

As with people, narcissists consider animals commodities to be used. Animals can make a narcissist look good, feel good, and provide many other benefits. Narcissists don’t have emotional empathy for animals, although some fake it well. Particularly when it’s in their best interests. If a narcissist is nice to animals, question their motives. Are they trying to get to you through them? Bolster their façade? Or impress someone for some reason? If your narcissist partner is desperate to walk their dog at a particular time, they could be using it as a pick up tool. And may be hoping to bump into someone specific. See how they react if you offer to go with them! As with people, narcissists are only interested when there’s something to gain. And as soon as animals usefulness expires, they’re happy to throw them on the scrapheap. Surplus to requirements.


Πηγή: https://narcissisms.com/narcissists-and-animals/

Σχετικό θέμα: Η ναρκισσιστική πλευρά της παρασυσσώρευσης ζώωνNarcissists And Hoarding at https://narcissisms.com/narcissists-and-hoarding/


Photo: Σκύλος που εγκαταλείφθηκε σε καταφύγιο [via The Army of the Kind (Fb)] 


Δείτε επίσης: What narcissists get from their pets (άρθρο της βιοψυχολόγου Katherine Compitus στο Psychology Today)



Σάββατο 3 Φεβρουαρίου 2024

Καρκίνοι και άλλες επιπτώσεις της στείρωσης του σκύλου, σε σχέση με την ηλικία, το φύλο και την φυλή


Are There Reasons Not to Neuter Your Dog? 





Αναδημοσίευση 

από 

dogcancer.com/



While spaying and neutering have been known to improve the lifespan and reduce the incidence of some common reproductive cancers and diseases, these procedures may also be associated with an increased incidence of other forms of cancer and conditions that may affect some dogs more than others. It turns out that there are some reasons not to neuter your dog, or to delay the procedure.


Spay and neuter recommendations have traditionally been made by veterinarians based on several factors. Those include the reduction in mammary cancer and pyometra in females and the elimination of some prostate conditions like benign prostatic hyperplasia and testicular cancer in males as well as a reduction of harmful male behaviors such as roaming and aggression. Additionally, we can see an increased lifespan and a reduction in unwanted pregnancies which can overwhelm shelters. However, some of these justifications have conflicting evidence.


Spaying and neutering have been shown to have a significant association with an increased lifespan. In one study involving more than 70,000 dogs, it was found that neutering increased a male dog’s lifespan by 13.8% and increased a female dog’s lifespan by 26.3% and is consistent across different size classes. Intact female dogs are at risk of developing reproductive tract associated diseases such as mammary cancer and pyometra, which can become fatal if not addressed. In one study, as many as 66% of intact female dogs developed mammary (breast) tumors. Another study found that 50% of these tumors were malignant and led to the death of 30% of intact females. Virtually no cases of mammary cancer developed in dogs spayed early, before the first heat cycle. Some breeds appear to be at a greater risk of developing mammary tumors such as Boxers with a 45% risk and Beagles with a 63% risk. Pyometra is an infection of the uterus that can make dogs very ill, resulting in death in 7.5% of intact dogs in a recent study. The risk of pyometra has been shown to be as much as 66% in intact female dogs over 9-10 years of age, and some breeds such as Collies, Golden Retrievers, Labrador Retrievers, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds appear to be at greater risk. Spaying is curative and preventative for this condition.


For males, neutering reduces the presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (excessive growth of the prostate gland) that can affect up to 80% of intact males and predispose them to developing potentially life-threatening diseases such as prostatitis, prostatic abscesses, and infected cysts. Neutering is curative and preventative for this condition. While neutering eliminates the risk of testicular cancer in male dogs, the risk of an intact dog with normally descended testicles developing testicular cancer is low at 1%. Therefore, the risk of testicular cancer in intact dogs might not be a strong determining factor in the decision to neuter. Behaviors such as roaming and aggression toward other dogs are often seen as a contributing factor for physical trauma or relinquishment to shelters. While several older studies have shown a drastic reduction of problematic male behaviors like roaming and aggression with neutering, others have shown a weak association between the two. At this time, more research needs to be performed to adequately determine if there is a significant reduction in potentially harmful behaviors with neutering.


Perception of the prevention of unintended pregnancies which can contribute to shelter dog overpopulation is often used as a justification for spaying and neutering dogs. But while spaying and neutering will reduce the risk of unintended pregnancies, the effect may not transfer to a reduction of shelter and stray dogs. Studies in multiple states have found that after providing low-cost spay/neuter clinics, the percentage of sterilized dogs increased dramatically while the shelter intake numbers did not change. The lack of change in shelter population may be due to the large percentage of dogs in the United States who are sterilized and that roughly two thirds of litters are bred intentionally rather than accidentally.


Negative Consequences – Reasons Not to Neuter Your Dog: While there are strong reasons to recommend spaying and neutering dogs, the consequences of a sterilized status can include:

  • Increased risk of developing cancer and dying of cancer
  • Increased risk of some orthopedic conditions like cranial cruciate ligament injury, hip and elbow dysplasia
  • Increased risk of osteoarthritis (affecting some breeds more than others)

From a database of 40,000 dogs, spayed and neutered dogs were more likely to die of cancer than intact dogs. Lymphoma, osteosarcoma, and mast cell tumors stood out in particular.

While it is important to consider the above factors when deciding whether to spay or neuter a dog, it is worth noting that in a study looking at 35 different breeds, most were unaffected by spay and neuter status or the age at which they were sterilized with regards to cancer development and joint disorder risk.


The development of cancer in dogs is a complex process that depends on many different internal and external factors. Spaying and neutering remove the sex hormones estrogen and testosterone from the body, which can affect many different tissues, especially when performed before the dog has fully maturedIn some cases, such as mammary cancer, the removal of these hormones can be beneficial when performed before sexual maturation. Recommendations for whether and when a dog should be spayed or neutered may depend on many factors including breed and sex. These recommendations are often taken from studies showing associations between the presence of different diseases in sterilized dogs that may or may not be separated by breed.

Since we see differences in the rate of cancer between dog breeds, pooling data from different breeds together may provide a skewed perspective of cancer risk depending on what dogs are included. A limitation of many of these studies is that they are retrospective, which means they are performed by looking back at a dog’s history through medical records or questionnaires rather than a designed experiment where all other variables are controlled and accounted for. This means that there could be other factors and exposures that may affect an individual dog’s risk of cancer apart from their genetic predispositionA limitation of many breed-specific studies is that they are based on a relatively small number of dogs. When a smaller sample size is used, trends and data will be more affected by random variation in individuals that may not be observed in a larger group of dogs. Finally, most studies about the effect of spaying and neutering on the development of cancer in dogs are performed on data obtained from records from referral hospitals. This may result in cancer types appearing to be more prevalent than they truly are because dogs with conditions that their regular veterinarians can manage will not be seen at a referral hospital, and therefore are not included in the study.


It is tempting to want to generalize the ideal time to spay or neuter dogs, but there is evidence to suggest that different breeds and sexes may have different ideal sterilization times to reduce the risk of different conditions including cancer and joint disorders. One of the reasons we observe different disease trends among different dog breeds is due to the genetic component to diseases like cancer. Breed groupings and size both appear to affect the incidence of disease both before and following sterilization. For example, breeds categorized as “working” or “sporting” breeds by the American Kennel Club, appear to be at an increased risk of lymphosarcoma, mast cell tumors, hemangiosarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Spayed females seem to be more at risk than neutered males. Breeds in this grouping include the Boxer, Golden Retriever, Vizsla, Labrador Retriever, Cocker Spaniel, and Rottweiler, among others. Additionally, in some breeds within the “herding” group, such as German Shepherds and Australian Shepherds, and some of the large and giant breeds, spayed and neutered dogs are at an increased risk of osteosarcomaInterestingly, neutered males in the “hound” group such as the Afghan Hound, Bassett Hound, Bloodhound, and Borzoi show a reduced risk of osteosarcoma while spayed female dogs appear to be at an increased risk. Some cancers, namely mammary cancer, have a strong association between the age at which a dog is spayed and the development of tumors and malignancy. Dogs spayed before the first heat have been shown to have a drastically reduced risk of developing this form of cancer (0.5% risk) compared to dogs spayed after the second estrus or after 2.5 years of age (26% risk). The risk of development of mammary cancer in intact dogs varies from 23-63% and is virtually eliminated when a dog is spayed early. 


Information about the risk of some different breeds and sexes developing cancer is listed below. While providing more individualized data, the small number of dogs studied for some breeds means that the trends observed may not be seen when a larger group of dogs is studied. Additionally, some breeds have not been studied, so it can be difficult to determine the most effective sterilization times for those breeds. Therefore, breed-specific information can be helpful in guiding spay and neuter decisions but should also be viewed with caution.

Australian Shepherd (440 dogs studied): Spaying after 6 months of age increased the risk of cancer, specifically mammary cancer. Neutered males showed no change in cancer risk above that in intact males.

Bernese Mountain Dogs (235 dogs): Females spayed before 6 months of age had a 2-fold increase in cancer compared to intact females. Males showed no change in cancer risk with neuter status.

Border Collie (399 dogs): Neutered males and females altered between 6-11 months of age have a significantly increased risk of cancer to as much as 13% and 11% by sex, compared to 2% in intact males and none for intact females.

Boston Terrier (291 dogs): Males had significant increase in cancer when neutered before 11 months of age while cancer risk did not appear to be affected by time of spay in females.

Boxer (761 dogs): Neutering before 2 years of age resulted in a significant increase in cancer risk from 17% to 32%. Spayed females also had an increased risk of cancer when altered before 2 years old to 20% compared to the risk of intact females at 11%.

Cocker Spaniel (369 dogs): Females spayed between 1-2 years of age had a significantly increased risk in the amount of mast cell tumor diagnoses at 17% compared to no cases observed in intact females. Neutering time in males was not associated with increased risk.

Collie (116 dogs): An increase of cancer risk to 40% was observed in females spayed before 6 months of age with none seen in intact females. Neutering males was not associated with an increased risk of developing cancer.

Doberman (358 dogs): Neutering males after 1 year of age was associated with an increased risk of cancer but not significantly above levels seen in intact males. Spayed females were not at increased cancer risk.

Golden Retriever (1,247 dogs): Neutering males before 1 year of age showed an increased risk in cancer development but was not significantly elevated from the high risk of cancer seen in intact males (15%). Spaying females after 6 months showed an increased cancer risk 3-4 times the risk in intact females.

Irish Wolfhound (86 dogs): Neutering males around 1 year of age had a 25% risk of cancer compared to 8% in intact males. Spaying females did not increase the cancer risk above a high baseline level of 21%.

Rottweiler (683 dogs): Spaying and neutering prior to 1 year of age resulted in a risk of bone cancer more than 3 times that of intact females and more than 4 times that of intact males. This translates to a 25% chance of developing cancer when sterilized before a year of age, particularly for osteosarcoma, compared to intact dogs.

Standard Poodle (275 dogs): Males neutered at 1 year of age had a significant increase in cancer risk to 27%, all due to lymphosarcoma, compared to a 4% risk in intact males. There was no significant increase in cancer risk with spaying above the 2% risk in intact females.

Shih Tzu (432 dogs): Females spayed between 6-11 months of age had a 7% risk of cancer which increased to 18% when spayed after 1 year compared to no cases of cancer seen in intact females. Neutered males did not have an increased risk of cancer with no cases observed.

Vizsla (2,505 dogs): Spaying and neutering at any age was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing lymphoma, mast cell cancer, hemangiosarcoma, and other cancers combined compared to intact dogs.

The remaining breeds in the study of 35 breeds where spaying/neutering did not appear to increase the risk of cancer: Australian Cattle Dog, Beagle, Bulldog, Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, Chihuahua, Welsh Corgi, Dachshund, English Springer Spaniel, German Shepherd, Great Dane, Jack Russell Terrier, Labrador Retriever, Maltese, Miniature Schnauzer, Pomeranian, Toy Poodle, Miniature Poodle, Pug, Saint Bernard, Shetland Sheepdog, West Highland White Terrier, and Yorkshire Terrier. 


Gonadectomy, or the removal of the reproductive organs, can be done in a few different ways. Procedures for gonadectomies vary by sex and are explained in more detail below.

Ovariohysterectomy: This procedure is the standard spay method in the United States and involves the removal of the uterus and ovaries. This eliminates the estrus (heat) cycle of the female and her ability to reproduce.

Ovariectomy: This procedure involves removal of just the ovaries while leaving the uterus intact. This procedure is more commonly performed in Europe and is typically performed laparoscopically. This eliminates the estrus (heat) cycle of the female and her ability to reproduce.

Laparoscopic spay: Surgeries performed laparoscopically involve 2-3 smaller incisions used for the insertion of the scope and surgical equipment. During the procedure, the abdomen is filled with carbon dioxide gas to allow for easier visualization of the tissues. The benefits of a laparoscopic spay include a faster and less painful recovery due to the smaller incisions as well as an easier method for removing the uterus and ovaries in overweight or obese dogs. Both ovariohysterectomies and ovariectomies can be performed laparoscopically. While it has benefits, laparoscopic procedures tend to be more costly and less available than traditional open surgical methods.

Ovary-sparing hysterectomy (OSH) or ovary-sparing spay (OSS): This procedure involves the surgical removal of the uterus while leaving the ovaries intact and functional. Since the ovaries are still present, dogs who have had an ovary-sparing spay will still experience the hormonal effects of a heat cycle including an enlarged vulva and willingness to breed even though they are not physically able to become pregnant without the uterus. While the estrus cycle is still present, no bleeding occurs while the dog is in heat since the uterus has been completely removed. Benefits of the OSH procedure include a reduction in the risks of cancers associated with traditional spaying as well as a prevention of the spay-associated increased risk of joint disorders and urinary incontinence. However, since this is not a surgical procedure commonly performed in the United States, there is limited research about disease incidence in these dogs. The disadvantages of the OSH include the potential for developing mammary and ovarian cancer as well as a “stump” pyometra if glandular uterine tissue is not fully removed.


Complications of ovariohysterectomies, ovariectomies, and hysterectomies are uncommon but may include:

  • anesthetic complications
  • bleeding
  • poor wound healing (dehiscence)
  • infection
  • ovarian remnant syndrome, which can result in signs of estrus if there is any ovarian tissue left in the abdomen

Neuter or Castration


Orchiectomy: This procedure involves removal of the testes and prevents males from reproducing.

Pre-scrotal castration: Neutering may be performed by making an incision in the area in front of the scrotum, called a pre-scrotal castration. This procedure has been previously recommended and taught to veterinarians as the preferred method to reduce the risk of complications and self-trauma to the surgical site, despite evidence that it has a slower recovery time than the scrotal approach.

Scrotal castration: The scrotal castration method contrasts with the pre-scrotal method in that the incision is made through the tissue of the scrotum. The surgical site may be closed with suture or left open to heal in juvenile dogs. This method has been found to result in less self-trauma and a 30% faster recovery time.


Complications of an orchiectomy are usually rare and short term and can include:

  • anesthetic complications
  • swelling
  • bleeding
  • hematomas
  • infection

Vasectomy: A vasectomy can offer an alternative to castration and involves the removal or occlusion of the vas deferens in the scrotum. This prevents the dog from being able to ejaculate sperm while mating. Within 24 hours, sperm are no longer present in the ejaculate. A benefit of this procedure is the ability to retain the protective aspect of testosterone in the body, while disadvantages can include the risk of developing a “sperm granuloma” from built-up fluid in the epididymis as well as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and the normally low risk of testicular cancer. If any of these conditions develop, castration should be curative.

Chemical Castration: Chemical sterilization can be an effective alternative to traditional surgical castration methods and can be performed with three different kinds of chemical agents: hormonal methods, immunocontraceptives, and inorganic chemosterilants. Hormonal methods can include an implant that is placed subcutaneously under the skin, such as Suprelorin, that releases a hormone called GnRH which blocks testicular function by desensitizing the pituitary gland to the normally stimulating effect of GnRH. This method typically lasts around 6 months. Immunocontraceptives work by forming antigen-antibody complexes to targets in the testicles to prevent sperm development and maturation. This method is effective as long as there is a sufficient amount of circulating antibody present in the blood stream to bind with its target in the testicle. 

Inorganic chemosterilants provide permanent sterilization with an injection into the testicles. There are three different chemicals that can do this. The most commonly utilized is zinc gluconate neutralized by arginine, which was approved by the FDA in 2003 as the product Neutersol, and then later as a similar product, Zeuterin. Another effective chemosterilant is calcium chloride, which has the benefit of a lower risk of severe injection site reactions compared to the other agents. A third effective sterilization agent includes hypertonic saline which is an attractive choice as it is incredibly inexpensive.

Benefits of using non-surgical, permanent chemosterilants include the prevention of risks associated with surgery and anesthesia as well as being an effective method of population control in some nations with large numbers of stray dogs. Disadvantages of using chemosterilants include an increased risk of pain, swelling, and redness of the testicles that can last for 3-5 days, as well as lethargy and diarrhea which are typically temporary. 


When Spay or Neuter Decreases Cancer Risk


Spaying and neutering have several benefits for the health and longevity of dogs and can reduce the risk of developing certain cancers.

1. Mammary cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer seen in intact female dogs. Of the mammary cancers diagnosed in intact dogs, approximately 50% are malignant. Spaying before the first heat cycle can greatly reduce the likelihood of developing mammary cancer from 25-63% (varying by breed) to 0.5%, nearly eliminating the risk. Large breed dogs have a 58% risk of developing malignant mammary cancer, compared with small breed dogs who have a 25% risk of developing malignant mammary cancer. Therefore, the size of a dog should be considered when weighing the decision to spay as larger dogs are at a much greater risk of developing cancer than their smaller counterparts.

2. Testicular cancer: Neutering eliminates the risk of testicular cancer in male dogs although this form of cancer is relatively rare and less than 1% of intact male dogs die of testicular cancer. This low death rate is likely due to the high cure rate when neutering is performed after diagnosis.

3. Perianal cancer: Cancer in the perianal area can include the anal sac glands and the tissue surrounding the anus called hepatoid glands. Tumors in this area can include benign growths called adenomas and malignant cancers called adenocarcinomas. Benign adenomas make up over 80% of the tumors seen in the perianal area and are hormone dependentWhile perianal adenomas are more common in older intact male dogs, they can occasionally occur in younger, neutered, or female dogs as well. In males, treatment for perianal cancer involves removal of the tumor with castration performed at the same time. Removal of the presence of testosterone is often effective at reducing tumor growth and preventing recurrence.


While sterilization reduces the incidence of most cancers in the reproductive tract, it can have the effect of increasing the risk of a dog developing other forms of cancer elsewhere in the body.

1. Prostate cancer: Neutering male dogs has been associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. The prostate is a gland in male dogs that sits at the neck of the urinary bladder and produces fluids found in semen. Symptoms of prostate cancer can include difficulty urinating, blood in the urine, and potentially difficulty defecating. While neutering does appear to increase the risk of developing prostate cancer by 4 times that of intact dogs, it should also be noted that the overall risk of developing prostatic cancer is low at less than 1%.

2. Bladder cancer: Spaying and neutering have been shown to result in an increased risk of developing transitional cell carcinoma, a form of bladder cancer, 4 times that of intact dogs. Bladder cancer is generally more common in female dogs, but neutered males appear to have a 3.6 times higher risκk of developing transitional cell carcinoma and 3 times the risk of developing any bladder tumor compared to intact dogs.

Bladder cancer makes up 2% of canine cancers and some breeds, such as the Scottish Terrier, appear to be at higher risk compared to mixed breed dogs. Transitional cell carcinoma is generally a high grade and invasive cancer when it develops and results in clinical symptoms such as blood in the urine, difficulty urinating, or increased urinary urgency.

3. Osteosarcoma is the most common bone cancer found in dogs and can often be the cause of death for large and giant breed dogs. Osteosarcoma has a poor prognosis once diagnosed and patients have a median survival time of 5-18 months once diagnosed. Symptoms often include limping or pain on the affected limb. In a study involving 7,021 dogs, those that had undergone spaying or neutering had twice the risk of developing osteosarcoma compared to intact dogs and there did not appear to be a difference in risk with regard to sex. It is important to evaluate both a dog’s breed and body size when assessing the risk of developing bone cancer. Large body size appears to be the strongest predictor of the development of osteosarcoma and some breeds, such as the Rottweiler, tend to be at high risk after spaying and neutering resulting in 3-4 times increased risk compared to intact dogs while others, like the Vizsla and Labrador Retriever, showed no increased risk of osteosarcoma in sterilized dogs.

4. Hemangiosarcoma is a cancer of blood vessel walls that most commonly develops in the spleen and heart and makes up approximately 2% of canine cancers. While the incidence of hemangiosarcoma is low, there appears to be a significant increase in the risk of cancer development in spayed and neutered dogs. Females appear to be most strongly affected with spayed female dogs having 5 times the risk of developing cardiac hemangiosarcoma and 2.2 times the risk of developing splenic hemangiosarcoma compared to intact females. Neutered males also had a significantly increased risk of hemangiosarcoma compared to intact males and were more likely to be diagnosed with the splenic form of the disease. Despite the low incidence of hemangiosarcoma in dogs generally, some breeds of dogs such as the Golden Retriever, German Shepherd, Boxer, and Vizsla have already elevated risks for developing hemangiosarcoma that only increase once spayed or neutered. According to the Golden Retriever Club of America, Golden Retrievers have a 1 in 5 lifetime risk of developing hemangiosarcoma.

5. Lymphoma: Lymphomas are forms of cancer that originate from cells in the immune system called lymphocytes. This type of cancer is relatively common in dogs with roughly 20–100 cases per 100,000 individuals and while it can affect almost every organ, the areas of the body most commonly affected include parts of the lymphatic system such as the lymph nodes, spleen, and bone marrow. In a study of over 14,000 pairs of dogs, intact male dogs had the highest risk of developing lymphoma compared to neutered males and both spayed and intact females. This contrasts with studies performed with specific breeds such as Vizslas and Golden Retrievers. In Vizsla dogs, spayed and neutered dogs had over 4 times the risk of developing lymphoma or lymphosarcoma compared to intact dogs, with the highest risk when dogs were altered after 1 year of age. Another study involving Golden Retrievers showed that the risk of lymphosarcoma was 4 times higher in dogs castrated before a year of age compared to intact male dogs while there did not appear to be a change in lymphoma risk with spaying females. Additionally, in breeds where more than 1,000 control dogs were available, breeds such as the Bernese Mountain Dog, Boxer, Bullmastiff, Scottish Terrier, and Gordon Setters appeared to have the highest risk of developing lymphoma. Differences in the risk of developing lymphoma varies greatly between breeds and neuter status, underscoring the caution advised when looking at data from multiple dog breeds pooled together.

6. Mast cell tumors are a common type of skin tumor seen in dogs with some breeds, like the Boston Terrier, Boxer, Golden Retriever, and Labrador Retriever, particularly affected. Despite mast cell tumors making up a large percentage of canine skin tumors, the incidence of a dog in the general population developing mast cell tumors is low, around 0.1%. Even though spayed female dogs are over 4 times more likely to develop mast cell tumors compared to intact females, tumors present in spayed or neutered dogs were less likely to be high grade. An increased risk of mast cell cancer was not noted in neutered males compared to intact male dogs. In a study of Golden Retrievers, dogs spayed after 1 year of age had a 5.7% risk of developing mast cell tumors where the incidence was 0 in intact females. Dogs spayed before 1 year of age had a 2.3% chance of developing mast cell tumors. 


Other Diseases Protected by Intact Status


In addition to some forms of cancer, spaying and neutering may worsen the risk of a dog developing several other diseases such as orthopedic or joint disorders, urinary incontinence, and immune-mediated disease.


Orthopedic Disorders

Some orthopedic conditions such as cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) injury, hip and elbow dysplasia, as well as osteoarthritis generally have been shown to occur more frequently in spayed and neutered dogs with some differences in breed and sex. CCL injury is the most commonly reported joint disorder with an increased risk in sterilized dogs. Some breeds such as the Golden and Labrador Retrievers and German Shepherd Dog appear to be at particular risk, especially for those dogs spayed and neutered before six months of age.

In some studies, such as one conducted with Golden Retrievers, neutered male dogs had an increased risk of hip dysplasia double that of intact males while spayed females did not have an increased risk. This contrasts with findings from Labrador Retrievers, where females had an increased risk of developing hip dysplasia when spayed before a year of age while neutering status in males did not appear to have an impact on the development of hip dysplasia.

Dog breeds of large stature in the working, sporting, and herding groups have an increased risk of elbow and hip dysplasia which may be increased after spaying or neutering, leading to the conclusion that sterilization may worsen the risk of developing orthopedic disease in dogs who already have a susceptibility.


Urinary Incontinence

There is evidence from multiple studies showing that spayed females appear to have an increased risk of developing urinary incontinence compared to intact female dogs. Spayed females have a 20% risk of developing urinary incontinence, a risk that tends to worsen with increasing body size. The association between spay status and urinary incontinence appears to be sex-specific as neutering does not result in an increase in incontinence issues in male dogs.


Immune-mediated Disorders

Immune-mediated disorders occur due to a dysregulation of the immune system, often causing it to attack the body’s own cells unnecessarily. The risk of multiple immune-mediated conditions appears to increase after both spaying and neutering dogs, including immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), atopic dermatitis, hypothyroidism, hypoadrenocorticism (Addison’s disease), immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

The increased risks for these conditions tended to be present more strongly in spayed females except for immune-mediated hemolytic anemia and Addison’s disease which were more commonly seen in neutered male dogs.


Making the Best Decision for You and Your Dog


With the abundance of often-conflicting information available about spaying and neutering dogs, it can be difficult to determine the best option for an individual dog. Therefore, it is important to consider a wide range of factors when deciding whether to spay or neuter, including:

  • sex
  • breed
  • age
  • function
  • which health issues are the most important to prevent for that breed or mix

Due to the variation in these factors, there is often no clear choice about which option is the best one for an individual. Spaying and neutering are not one-size-fits-all! For example, the increased risk of orthopedic disease with neutering in some breeds may be more of a concern for veterinarians and dog lovers than preventing testicular cancer (which is relatively rare and easily cured), leading to the decision to not neuter. For another dog, the risk of mammary carcinoma may be high, so spaying early may be the most effective way to virtually eliminate that risk. For dogs in shelter and rescue situations, preventing unplanned litters is often the highest priority. Thus, it is important for dog lovers to discuss all these factors and their concerns with their veterinarian so they can make an informed choice about what might be right for them. The right choice for you and your dog may not be the right choice for your neighbor and their dog, and that is perfectly ok. 



*https://www.dogcancer.com/articles/causes-and-prevention/are-there-reasons-not-to-neuter-your-dog/